1. The plaintiffs' lawsuit against the defendant-appellant Co., Ltd. is dismissed.

2.(a)

The plaintiffs and defendant corporation.

1. A claim against Defendant Dental, Inc., Kitco, Ltd., virtual glass, and L;

(a) Description of claims: To describe the cause of claims and the changed cause of claims as shown in the annex;

(b) Judgment made by deeming confessions: Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act;

2. Claim against Defendant J

(a) Description of claims: To describe the cause of claims and the changed cause of claims as shown in the annex;

(b) Judgment by public notice: Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act;

3. A claim against Defendant Appellant-Wurg Co., Ltd., Ltd., Co., Ltd., Ltd., C, D, E, F, Samsung Heavy Industries Co., Ltd., one mining industry, G, H, Cheong tower Logistics, I,K, and Taelim Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter the above Defendants referred to as “Defendant’s accuracy trade, etc.”).

A. Under the basic facts (1), Defendant Appellant-Wurg Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Appellant-Wurg”) has the right to the goods of KRW 228,661,409 (hereinafter “instant bonds”) by supplying households related to “M new apartment construction work” to the long-term household company (hereinafter “long-term household”).

(2) On May 3, 2012, Plaintiff A and Defendant Dhurg’s assignment and notification (A) drafted a written statement of non-performance to transfer KRW 35,000,000 among the instant claims to Plaintiff A. On May 7, 2012, the said fact was notified to the head of the authorization office for the assignment of claims with a content certification with a fixed date fixed, and the said notification reached the head of the authorization office on May 8, 2012.

(B) On June 16, 2012, Plaintiff A and Defendant Ahhhurg drafted a direct written consent to transfer KRW 62,000,000 among the instant bonds to Plaintiff A. On June 18, 2012, notified the fact of the assignment of the instant bonds with the content certification with the fixed date within the authorizing authority, and the said notification reached the long-term authorizing authority around that time.

(3) The assignment and notification (A) of the assignment of claims and notification by Plaintiff B and Defendant Ahurgs, Plaintiff B and Defendant Ahurgs, on May 3, 2012, 10.