logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.05.02 2012고합711
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(위계등추행)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was a teacher in charge of Chigh School sports.

1. On September 201, the Defendant continued to teach sports classes in C High School dance and classrooms located in Daejeon Sung-gu Daejeon, Daejeon. Around September 201, the Defendant: (a) reported that the victim E (in women, 16 years of age) is going to a shot on his/her face; and (b) carried the victim’s knife his/her knife with his/her knife with his/her knife and knife his/her knife with his/her knife with his/her knife, thereby committing an indecent act by force by force.

2. On September 201, 201, the Defendant pointed out the clothes of the victim participating in the voluntary activities in the Babbage, and committed an indecent act by force against the victim by leaving the victim’s chests only with his hand, at the entrance of G Grasan, Grain Gingu, Daejeon, Daejeon.

3. At around 10:00 on September 26, 201, the Defendant: (a) followed the victim, who was going up with the first floor of the above school from the 1st floor to the 1st floor above the above school, after completing volunteer activities for the admission of new students; and (b) stated, “I see why you are very lele or how you are personal; and (c) I see that I kn’s kn’s kn’s kn’s kn’s kn’s kn’s kn’s kn’s kn’ss kh

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the first protocol of trial;

1. Each legal statement of the witness H, I, J, and K;

1. The statement made by the witness E in the second protocol of the trial (the defendant denies each crime as indicated in the following purport). ① The defendant is somewhat less vulnerable to the victim’s damages, etc. to shoulder the victim, but there is no fact that the part of the loss floor was unfolded (Article 1). ② While the defendant gets off the victim’s clothes and skes the victim’s clothes, the defendant did not have any fact that he was able to take off the part on the part of the victim’s clothes, he was able to do so (Article 2). ③ The defendant was able to take off the victim’s clothes, but there is no fact that he was kicking the chest (Article 2).

arrow