logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.09.09 2019나71250
사망보험금
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiffs citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance shows the evidence submitted in this court, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows, except for the addition of the following "2. Additional Determination" with respect to the assertion that the plaintiffs emphasize or add to this court, and therefore, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance.

2. Additional determination

A. The plaintiffs' assertion of death in the plaintiffs' medical examination report "the presumption of cardio-fluorial color" is nothing more than the presumption of one response, and the deceased's death is not determined due to cardio-fluorial fluoring because there is no fluoring of heavy breast pain. It cannot be ruled out that the death of the deceased was caused by a fluor fluor or fluorial fluoral bru

Mam her butt, which the deceased complained of, shows the probability of a high fluence caused by the abortion, and the high fluorite is the cause of the heart color, and there is sufficient probability that two fluorals or fluoral transfusions caused by the death of the deceased immediately after the transfer to the hospital due to an abortion, are generated if he/she died immediately after the transfer to the hospital due to an abortion.

The Deceased stated that there was no fact that he was treated as a heart soldier for about six years immediately before the death, there was no fact that he was diagnosed as a heart, and the doctor J prepared a death diagnosis statement that he could not know the previous death.

In light of these circumstances, the causal relationship between the deceased’s death injury cannot be denied, and the defendant must pay the deceased’s death benefit to the plaintiffs.

B. The phrase “accidents that occur abroad”, which are the requirements of the insurance accident as stipulated in the insurance clause 1, is due to the physical defect of the insured, i.e., illness or physical physical factors of the insured.

arrow