Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 7, 2017, from around 02:40 to 03:20 on September 7, 2017, the Defendant treated the victim D’s work at the convenience store in Chungcheongbuk-si C, and the victim treated the homeless as the victim’s work.

Appellants, 112 and 2 police officers dispatched to the place upon receipt of the 112 report, the victim’s “whether or not the goods are sold under the discrimination against the person for the same year in which the swine was made;

C. The term “years created by C. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S.s. and d.s.s. for the victim’s spouse

“The purport,” and “after the police officer’s return to the police officer, etc., it refers to “the face of a little swine has taken a low face and it is not good that the face has taken a low face.” On the ground of the convenience of a person with an instigious old age, the police officer will be able to pay the money to him/her instigiously.” This person is insulting to this person in the same swine year.

The term “the victim” refers to “the victim, etc.,” and the police officer, who received a report again 112 and dispatched to the same place, publicly insulting the victim, such as “the victim’s “the same year of pigs.”

2. On September 7, 2017, the Defendant: (a) received a report from a police officer belonging to the E District Police Zone E District of the Incheon Police Station on the street in front of the above convenience point; and (b) requested him/her to return home on several occasions from the police officers belonging to the E District; (c) but rejected it; and (d) while F and nameless taxi officers hear, the Defendant’s victim G, a police officer belonging to the E District, who is a police officer belonging to the E District, “F chch chine chine chine chron

whether they were police to do so;

Domins Domins Domins

“Publicly insulting the victim,” stating to the purport, the victim was sexually insulting.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to G or D;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (on-site CCTV images);

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Article 37 of the Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes Act.