A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 13:50 on March 19, 2013, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, and thereby obstructing the legitimate performance of duties of the national tax investigator in relation to the property duties of the national tax investigator by assaulting C, who was in charge of property tax and duties at the property tax and office of the third floor of the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 388-6.

2. Definating;

A. On April 3, 2013, around 16:20 on April 16, 2013, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim C by saying, “At least 30 persons who had been working in the office described in paragraph (1) and who are hearing property tax and employees, the Defendant read the victim C as follows: “I have to pay for the next year because I have to pay the money within the lower year,” and “I have to pay for it.”

B. At around 15:35 on April 4, 2013, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim C by saying, “The Defendant was 30 persons who had been working in the office described in paragraph (1) and were heard by the property tax and employees. There are many crimes of poor age. There have been a lot of money in Korea. There have been no money in Korea, but no money in Korea. It has been embezzled.”

C. At around 16:00 on April 8, 2013, the Defendant publicly insultd the victim C by saying, “The Defendant was aware of the fact that 30 persons had been working in the office as described in paragraph (1) and about 30 persons who had been working in the office as described in paragraph (1), for the purpose of “the Defendant was wrong for a lower period of time for the principal, but the female of ethyl ether,” and “the lower level of nitro ether. are still known at the night. The Defendant shall be detained for a lower period of time.” This shall be called as “the date on which the Defendant was detained for a short period of time.”

3. Refusal to eviction.

A. On April 3, 2013, at around 16:20, the Defendant demanded that his tax be refunded at the above office, such as paragraph 2(a), and that his tax be refunded.