logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 상주지원 2013.05.21 2013고단136
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

However, the defendant A is subject to objection.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that there is no concern about actual disadvantage to the Defendants’ exercise of their respective defense rights, criminal facts are recognized by rhying the facts charged without modification of indictment.

1. No one who commits a joint crime by the Defendants shall provide the contents different from those classified by the Game Rating Board for the use of game products, and shall engage in business of exchanging tangible and intangible results acquired through the use of game products as a business;

Nevertheless, the Defendants provided a game machine with E, and Defendant A provided a registered name of the game room and managed the overall game room. Defendant B conspired to run a game room by assisting the customer's response and exchange, and operated a mutual game room of "G", which had been registered in the name of Defendant A from June 22, 2011 to June 29, 201 in accordance with the above public offering, and operated the game room in the name of Defendant A at the time of residence from June 22, 2011 to June 29, 201. Unlike the following: (a) as the image of the original game as an image of the original game, the Defendant was rated as having been exposed from time to time in the game; (b) the value of the original image and the back-up file of the game data is linked; and (c) Defendant B provided 10,000 points on the left side of the game screen with the original image and provided 20,000 points on the right side, and provided 100,000 points on the left side.

As a result, the Defendants provided game products with contents different from the contents of the rating classification in collusion with E, and carried out a business exchange of results obtained through the use of game products.

2. The defendant A.

arrow