beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. From around 2008, the Plaintiff is a person who is engaged in the fish farming business of the non-fluoral fish and the fish fish in the G farm farm located in Kim Jong-si (hereinafter “the fish farm in this case”). The Defendant is an appraisal business entity who was requested by the Korea Appraisal Board (hereinafter “Korea Appraisal Board”) in charge of compensation affairs in relation to the creation of a “D General Industrial Complex” (hereinafter “N&A”), which was entrusted with appraisal of the damage compensation for the fish farm in this case.
B. On September 5, 2008, the land for the fish farm in the instant case was designated as the site for “D general industrial complex” as the G publicly notified by Jeollabuk-do on September 5, 2008. The land for the fish farm in the instant case was also incorporated into the relevant industrial complex.
C. The Korea Appraisal Board requested the Defendant to conduct an appraisal on the compensation procedure for damage to the fish farm in this case before the fish farm in this case. On September 6, 2010, the Defendant requested the I, the head of H Research Institute, to conduct an appraisal on the compensation procedure for damage to the fish farm in this case. On September 6, 2010, the Defendant requested the I, who is the head of the H Research Institute, to conduct an investigation on the fish species and the number of passengers of the fish farms in the fish farm in the fish farm in this case, the expected period of suspension due to the transfer of the fish farm,
I performed the instant service on September 18, 2010 and around the 19th day of the same month by investigating the fish species, number, etc. of non-fat fishing and fat fishing in the state of partial discharge of water inside the fish farm under the participation of L&A and Defendant employees, etc.
However, after the service of this case, there have occurred a situation in which a large number of the non-afs in the fish farm of this case and the gold roof fish were collectively discarded, and the plaintiff transferred the remaining fish to the J in the North west-gun.
E. I, as a result of performing the instant service, is 30,66ma of the non-afished fish in the instant fish farm.