1. The Defendant’s KRW 23,30,232 as well as 5% per annum from November 16, 2018 to February 6, 2020 to the Plaintiff.

The occurrence of liability

A. In full view of the overall purport of Gap's statements, Gap 1 and 5, Gap 2-1-2-15, 6-1-6-5 and Eul's testimony and arguments, the plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on October 2, 2007 and December 26, 2007 as to the size of 717 square meters for the above land from February 2, 2017 to May 2018, the plaintiff constructed a fish farm (hereinafter "the fish farm of this case") with a length of about seven meters, width of 4.2 meters, depth of 1.7 meters from the fish farm (hereinafter "the fish farm of this case"), and the plaintiff was unable to supply a new fish farm (the "the fish farm of this case"), and the defendant's construction work of the fish farm of this case was entrusted with the construction work of the fish farm of this case to the Republic of Korea on June 2, 2018, and the defendant's construction work of the fish farm of this case was recognized as an "the fish farm of this case".

B. According to the above facts, although the defendant's employee F was obligated to enter the fish farm near the fish farm in the instant case when operating a heavy defendant-free vehicle, not a road, due to the negligence of entering the fish farm to the fish farm in the instant case, resulting in the collapse of the fish farm in the instant case due to the negligence of entering the fish farm in the instant case. Thus, the defendant is obligated to compensate for all damages due to the instant accident pursuant to Article 756 (1) of the Civil Act.

The defendant could not know the situation of the land surrounding the fish farm in this case as F at the time of the accident.