1. All appeals filed by the Defendant (Appointeds) and the designated parties are dismissed;

2. The appeal costs.

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

A. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning the instant case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except in the following cases, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(b)be amended by the following: (a) parallel Twelves 12 to 17 of the judgment of the first instance:

1) The Plaintiff’s attached network T is 53.5m2 on the ground before subdivision around 1945 (hereinafter “instant house”).

) New construction (the building ledger was registered in the name of the plaintiff).

(2) From around that time, the Plaintiff occupied the land before subdivision. (2) Around around 1970 on the ground before subdivision, 16m2 in a 16m2 warehouse on the ground of the land before subdivision (hereinafter “instant warehouse”). In the event that the instant housing and warehouse are collectively referred to, the instant housing, etc. was newly constructed, and registered in the building ledger together with the instant housing.

(c)for the first instance court's decision, the 11th to 15th court's decision is amended as follows:

In around 1945, the deceased T was completed by being awarded a contract for construction of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the

Therefore, the Defendants, the deceased F and L’s successors, and the designated parties, are liable to the Plaintiff for the registration of ownership transfer on August 31, 2005, based on their respective inheritance shares ratio among the instant land.

(Plaintiff’s assertion to the effect that it occupied the instant land from August 1945 and completed the prescriptive acquisition on August 31, 1965. However, it is evident that Plaintiff’s claim of this case is seeking the registration of ownership transfer due to the completion of prescriptive acquisition on August 31, 2005.

Part 2 through 6 of the judgment of the first instance.