logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.07.22 2016고단994
특수공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be forfeited from the defendant.

The facts charged of this case.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 6, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year by imprisonment with prison labor for special assault, etc. at the District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 15, 2016.

The accused committed the following crimes under the status that the accused is under the lack of the ability to discern things or make decisions due to a Compilation mental division:

1. On March 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 00:10, at the main points operated by the victim D in Gyeyang-gu C, Gyeyang-gu; (b) was engaged in as if the Defendant would normally pay the drinking value; and (c) ordered 5 joint owners of beer.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the drinking value due to the lack of money.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and received a delivery of 50,000 won in total from the injured party.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1. Paragraph 1. At the time and place specified in the foregoing Paragraph, he acted as he would be able to demand the said D to pay the drinking value, and committed an act, such as assaulting the above main place where he prevented him, and upon receiving a 112 report, sent to the site by a slope G belonging to the Goyangyang Police Station F District of the Goyangyang Police Station, and asked questions about the circumstances of the case.

C. Sponse fifine

“As we can see, as you do with the bath theory, we display a drinking, and assault the victim’s right door at one time to walk.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

3. On April 13, 2016, the Defendant: (a) reported 112 as a side noise noise from the IB located in Gyeyang-gu, Seoyang-gu; (b) on April 13, 2016, the police officer did not neglect and send the 112 report; and (c) the police officer resisted the J to the police officer belonging to the Goyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, J.

During that period, the Defendant does not take back 1 knife from the machine of Agrific occupation (23 cm in total length, 12 cm in length).

In this sense, "12 declarations have been accepted".

arrow