logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
red_flag_2
(영문) 서울가정법원 2010. 1. 29. 선고 2009르1499 판결
[이혼][미간행]
Plaintiff and appellant

Plaintiff (Attorney Kim Jong-hwan, Counsel for plaintiff-appellant)

Defendant, Appellant

Defendant (Attorney Park Poe-young, Counsel for defendant-appellant)

Conclusion of Pleadings

November 20, 2009

The first instance judgment

Seoul Family Court Decision 2007Nu74907 Decided April 17, 2009

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The plaintiff and the defendant shall be divorced.

Reasons

The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is as stated in Paragraph 1 of Article 12 of the Family Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except that "each entry of Nos. 1 through 17 (including paper numbers)" in No. 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance is "the family investigator's report and investigation report of the family affairs in No. 1 through No. 25 (including each item number)". Thus, this is cited by the main text of Article 12 of the Family Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Ahn Young-ro (Presiding Judge) Kim Young-soon

arrow