A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 4, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 06:15, the Defendant: (b) sent the Victim E and the Defendant’s female job offers F at the Busan So-gu D Ssing room on the ground that the Defendant was accompanied by the Victim E and the Defendant’s female job offers F, and (c) caused the Victim’s injury to the Victim, such as the Victim’s hair, by drinking, by holding the Victim’s face at hand at two parallels, which are dangerous goods on the tables, and by holding the Victim’s head at hand, and continuously holding the Victim’s head at “h and D,” and “the Victim was seated by width,” and the Victim was collected from the Victim, and walking the Victim’s boat, walking the Victim’s walk, and taking three remaining sons in two weeks, which require two weeks’ treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. A damaged photograph, on-site photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [the scope of recommendation] The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act [the scope of punishment] where a person who has been subject to special mitigation [the person who has been subject to special mitigation] is not subject to punishment (including efforts to recover damage), or where considerable damage has been restored (the decision of sentence] where a person who has committed the instant crime again committed the instant crime against the defendant even though there are several times of force of violent protection disposition, is disadvantageous to the defendant.

The fact that the injured party does not want the punishment of the defendant by agreement with the defendant, and the defendant seems to have an attitude to recognize and reflect the fact of the crime.

In addition, the circumstances, means and methods of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime, the age, and sex of the defendant.