beta
Text
Defendant
The appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
Summary of Grounds for Appeal
On March 16, 2012, the Defendant appeared in the court of Hongsung Branch of Daejeon District Court No. 214 on March 16, 2012 as a witness for a violation of the Music Industry Promotion Act against D, the above court of law No. 2011 high-level 383, and did not demand oral and oral testimony in singing, and the Defendant only testified the truth and did not make a false statement contrary to memory.
The sentence of unfair sentencing (two months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and one hundred and twenty hours of community service order) is too unreasonable.
Judgment
According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below and the trial court, the following facts are recognized.
D around 23:00 on June 16, 201, at the F K Kinginging 23:00, provided alcohol to the defendant who is a customer and arranged the defendant to provide entertainment to the defendant.
“The Defendant appeared and testified as a witness of the instant case on March 16, 2012, when he/she was charged with violating the Music Industry Promotion Act with the charge of violating the Music Industry Promotion Act, and was tried by the Daejeon District Court red support 201 high-level383. The Defendant was present and testified as a witness of the instant case on March 16, 2012. The summary of the testimony is that “The Defendant was unsatisfed by the inside part of D on the day of the instant case, and the Defendant was unsatisfing in the instant singing practice room, and the employee C was able to engage in any unsatisfing after the call with D, and that at the time, A was coming to talked with D. At the same time, it was reported that D was going to go to go to the seat of his/her room, and there was no orders for drinking in the said singing practice room or any satisfing.
In addition, A and C also appeared as a witness of the above case and testified with the same content as D's assertion and defendant's testimony.
However, the above court rejected the above testimony and recognized the fact that the defendant demanded drinking and gambling in the above singing practice room, and punished D on August 31, 2012 as violating the Music Industry Promotion Act.