logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2013.06.27 2013고단206
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant

B punished by a fine of 6,00,000 won, Defendant A by fine of 4,00,000 won.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 13, 2012, the Defendants: (a) under the influence of alcohol at “Eju store” located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si; (b) Defendant A, without any justifiable reason, was able to shaken the head of F’s head; (c) f’s face part of F’s face; and (d) the Defendants, among the employees of the said main store, reported to the police, reported to the police, she was placed outside of the business establishment by the following two customers, including: (a) she was flicked with a large amount of 20 minutes, and (b) she was flicked with a dog for 20 minutes, on the ground that she reported to the police.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the above main duties by force.

2. The Defendants obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) Defendant A and the body of Defendant A met when Defendant A and the body met when Defendant A put in the business site after receiving a report at the above time and at the above site; (b) Defendant B was tightly sealed with the chest of the above I, who embling the neck of the said H by hand, and embling it by hand; and (c) Defendant B took a bath in combination with this, and pushed the chest of the said I.

The Defendants continued to be arrested according to the G district and sound to the above H and I, etc., “Influencing the death in the outside of the criminal community, she was killed in the outside, she was influencated, she was influored, fluording the patrol vehicle, she was influent, she was in a fine not only if she was killed for two months due to the obstruction of performance of official duties, but only if she was in a fine not to be determined by the obstruction of performance of official duties.”

As a result, the Defendants conspired to commit the above H and I and thereby interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order and criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Each legal statement of witness I, H and F;

1. Each police statement made to I, H, and F;

1. Do image images by capturing the same;

1. Application of each CD-related statute

1. The Defendants: Article 136(1) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act.

arrow