A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 29, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Busan District Court on July 29, 2009, and was sentenced to a fine of four million won for the same crime in the same court on September 16, 2014.

1. On March 22, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and the Road Traffic Act (Dless driving) driving on a vehicle at around 09:30 on March 22, 2016, without obtaining a driver’s license, and driving a vehicle under the influence of alcohol at least 1.5 km from the Gyeyang-gu, the U.S., U.S., U. S., a U. P., a U.S., a U.S., a U., a U.S., a U., a U.S., driving on a vehicle under the influence of alcohol.

2. When the Defendant, at the time and time of Paragraph 1 of this Article, was discovered by drinking alcohol to the police box C of the U.S. Police Station C and the police box of the U.S. Police Station C, which was under traffic control, at a place, the Defendant used the signature of F in the driver’s signature in the driver’s signature of the inquiry as a result of regulating driving of a portable information terminal (PDA) presented by E while driving as one’s own relative F, and used it without authority for the purpose of exercising the risk of causing the occurrence of fines.

3. On March 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) stated that the Defendant was F in the column for confirmation of the driver’s report on the circumstances of driving at the State Police Station C of Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, for the purpose of uttering at a police box of the State Police Station C of Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, for the purpose of uttering at around 09:40 on March 22, 2016; (b) signed on the next page, and forged the report on the state driving under the name of F, a private document concerning proof of facts; and (c) delivered the report as if it was genuine to E who was aware of the forgery on that page.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. Notice of the results of the drinking control;