Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Seoul Southern District Court 2013Na51051 ( October 23, 2014)
Title
An assignment order issued under the concurrent status of seizure shall be null and void.
Summary
Each assignment order is null and void as it is obvious that the seized claim does not reach the amount of the seized claim at the time of the assignment order, when the seizure competes with each other.
Related statutes
Article 24 of the National Tax Collection Act
Cases
2014Da206181. Demurrer against distribution
Plaintiff
○ Kim
Defendant
Korea
Conclusion of Pleadings
March 13, 2014
Imposition of Judgment
June 12, 2014
Text
1. The appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the argument on the grounds of appeal by the appellant falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as