beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 10,00,000 to Plaintiff A, and KRW 5,00,000 to Plaintiff B, and each of them on July 18, 2015.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On July 17, 2015, Plaintiff A is the mother who was stillborn in the H hospital located in Daegu-gu G (hereinafter “instant hospital”) and Plaintiff B is the husband of Plaintiff A.
B. Defendant D is the doctor on duty of the instant hospital at the time of the first visit of Plaintiff A on July 17, 2015, the nurse of the said hospital, the nurse of the said hospital, and the defendant C, who had worked at the time of the visit of Plaintiff A, as the representative of the said hospital.
C. On November 25, 2014, Plaintiff A confirmed the fact of pregnancy at the instant hospital and continued to undergo a pre-industrial medical examination at the said hospital.
Plaintiff
A, around 00:00 on July 17, 2015, on the 5th day of pregnancy, around 37:00 (the period of the post-treatment occurred on the same day, and the subsequent date was omitted), had been kept in mind, and there was a pain at intervals of 10 minutes thereafter, and was transferred to the hospital of this case at around 06:00.
E. Defendant F brought the Plaintiff A with the result, which led to the Plaintiff’s mathoth, was laid down, and there was a little number of fluences on plastic bags used at the time of earthquake-proof, and Defendant F and E carried out an fluoral inspection (NST) of the Plaintiff F and E, which was within 140 times per minute, and the number of the fetus’s heart stay at the time of war was within a normal range of 140 times per minute, and the fluor’s fluoral fluorial fluoral fluor was not Rulely laid down.
F. Accordingly, Defendant E did not have any particular problem, and the Plaintiff determined that the delivery was not imminent, and “I have come to the house so that only the delivery would have yet to go to the house,” and “I have returned to the Plaintiff.” Defendant E and F did not receive any instruction from Defendant D, who is a doctor on duty in the course of the aforementioned examination and treatment.
G. The Plaintiff A returned home and thereafter, was a person who has blood transfusions to the extent that the pains continue to exceed 16:00, and passed away from the hospital of this case at around 17:01, and again returned to the hospital of this case. As a result of the examination at the time, there was a 2-3 cm opening, and a fetus’s heart stay at the time, and the number of the fetus’s heart stay at 91 times per minute.