logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2018.01.23 2017고단388
업무상횡령등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On November 15, 2013, the Defendant had a total of nine times criminal records, including a summary order of a fine of two million won for occupational embezzlement, etc., from the Jinwon District Court’s Jinju branch on November 15, 2013, and a person who received a summary order of a fine of three million won for embezzlement in the same court on June 24, 2014, respectively.

[2] The Defendant is a person who, from December 2, 2014, has been engaged in the delivery and collection of timber in the E of the victim D operation in Jinju-si from around Jin-si, 2014.

1. Occupational embezzlement;

A. On May 7, 2015, the Defendant, while receiving KRW 245,00 from F to the Agricultural Cooperative account (Account Number G) in the name of the Defendant for the use of personal use, such as living expenses, etc. from Jinju, around that time, embezzled the money owned by the victim for the use of personal use, such as living expenses, etc. from Jinju, and embezzled the money for the use of the victim’s possession for business purposes, as shown in the List of Crimes 1, while he/she kept the money for business purposes, he/she arbitrarily consumed KRW 24,810,00 for a total of 30 times, such as the list of crimes 1.

B. From May 7, 2015 to July 31, 2015, the Defendant: (a) received a total of KRW 5,362,000 from F in cash from the said place as a wood price for the use of wood; and (b) was in custody for the victim; (c) around that time, the Defendant embezzled the Defendant’s personal use, such as living expenses, for any personal purpose at the Jinju-siwon.

"2017 Highest 690"

2. On November 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the dormitory of the I Company H located in the Seocho-do Senior Policemen, the Defendant was deemed to need money to the victim J, who is a company partner.

Lastly, I talked that 50,000 won should be loaned.

However, in fact, the Defendant, while working in the construction material leasing chain I, had revenue of KRW 2 million per month, but there was no other specific property, and there was a loan obligation of KRW 2,50,000 as the parent should support the parent.

arrow