1. The Defendant’s decision on recommendations for the Defendant’s payment of credit card usage cases by the Incheon District Court 2008Gau42763.

1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

2. Judgment without holding any pleadings (Article 208 (3) 1 of the Civil Procedure Act);

3. According to Article 81 of the Civil Procedure Act, where a third party succeeds to all or part of the right or obligation which is the object of a lawsuit while the lawsuit is pending before the court, the third party may file an application for intervention in succession with the court in which the lawsuit is pending, specifying the purport of and reasons for intervention. Such application for intervention in succession constitutes a kind of lawsuit, and such application for intervention in succession constitutes a summary of lawsuit.

case is subject to the requirements of the lawsuit.

(see Supreme Court Decision 2011Da85789, Apr. 26, 2012). In a case where a person acquires a right, which is the subject matter of a lawsuit prior to the institution of a lawsuit, the application for intervention by succession does not satisfy the requirements for intervention by succession, and in such a case, the

(See Supreme Court Decision 83Meu1027 Decided September 27, 1983. As to the instant case, the Health Team and the succeeding intervenor filed an application for intervention on the ground that they acquired a claim against the Plaintiff from the Defendant on June 15, 201, prior to the continuation of the instant lawsuit, on the grounds that they acquired a claim against the Plaintiff, the succeeding intervenor’s application for intervention is unlawful as it does not meet the requirements for intervention by succession under Article 81 of the Civil Procedure Act