logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2015.06.19 2015고단94
공갈
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant posted a malicious engineer with respect to E agricultural partnership operated by the victim D (the age of 45) on the website of the waterworks daily website, which is a local newspaper C, with the intent of threatening the victim to receive money and valuables from the victim as if he continued to post the malicious engineer with respect to the said corporation; (b) on May 2014, the Defendant sent the victim phone to the victim during the police officer with the intent of threateninging the victim to commit fraud; and (c) on the victim’s phone, the Defendant expressed an article stating, “I will use an article about why the new company spreads swine disease, and I will use an article about it.” (d) The Defendant posted an article stating, “G” on the website of the waterworks daily website, stating that “The victim’s E farming association operated by E is in violation of the Environmental Act and spreads liquid manure without discrimination.”

Around 18:00 on May 29, 2014, the Defendant: (a) filed a complaint with the National Tax Service on the victim at a mutually infinite shop located in the upper Dong-dong on May 29, 2014, following the following facts: (b) “I are engaged in coverage activities by being provided with services at the Jeonnam liquid Distribution Center; (c) I are not participating in the National Tax Service; (d) why I are not participating in the pre-nam liquid distribution center; (e) I have no resolution method from the internal date; and (e) the Board of Audit and Inspection should also investigate the company as to why I would face the news report materials; and (e) if I would not follow the intention of the company, I would like to regularly demand money and valuables by threatening the malicious news article as if I would spread it; and (e) the victim, who was find, would be regularly paying protection expenses to the Defendant.

On June 12, 2014, the Defendant, as seen above, received money bags of KRW 1 million from a drinking victim, under the name of protection expenses, from the above Defendant’s threat, up to four times until September 24, 2014.

arrow