Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is the head of the Busan regional headquarters as a C and D newspaper reporter, E is a newspaper reporter, F is a newspaper reporter, and F is a newspaper reporter in Busan Dong-gu, Busan and D Busan branch office as the basis for the article in the Busan metropolitan area.
The Defendant and the above E, using the fact that they are newspaper reporters, did not respond to their demands, did not go to the way of reporting an article disadvantageous to business, as if they were likely to cause danger and injury, and did so to collect money from the drinking person.
Around July 2010, the Defendant and E are jointly aware of the fact that the J Co., Ltd., a subcontractor at the government-funded construction site of the H Facility Expansion Project in Busan Shipping Daegu, entered into a contract with the I Co., Ltd. on the construction site of the said construction site and sold sand for aggregate purposes by illegally removing sand from the private-time site near Yangsan-dong, Busan Metropolitan City, which is not a designated sand site, while carrying out transportation of soil and sand on the said construction site and selling it for aggregate purposes. The Defendant is aware of this problem.
8. Around May, 800, the victim JJ did not inform K employees of the total amount of KRW 25 million, including newspaper companies’ advertising fees of KRW 20 million and KRW 5 million for news gathering expenses, as if they were paid the above articles, and the J corporation instructed F F, who did not pay the above money, to prepare for publication of the article in C newspaper.
In addition, F, as the title "L" on August 7, 2010, posted an article on the M homepage, and the Defendant accepted the request from the above K to delete the Internet articles posted on the subject to the reduction of money, and otherwise, the Defendant accepted the request from the above K to the effect that “L may be removed, and if so, the company may be able to understand the proposal articles, to delete the proposal articles,” and E received the same month.
9. At around 15:00, the Defendant received KRW 12,00,000,000 issued by the said K at the site of LH site development work in Yangsan-si, and thereafter, the Defendant instructed F to delete the said article.
Accordingly, the defendant is jointly with E.