2014 Highest 2240 Fraud, Forgery of Private Document, and Uttering of Private Document

A

The highest completion of the indictment, and the right of the prosecution (public trial)

Attorney B (Korean National Assembly)

December 12, 2014

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Criminal History Office

From December 1996 to March 2014, the Defendant was an insurance solicitor of Samsung Life Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “ Samsung Life Insurance Co., Ltd.) and had the victim C, who became aware of in the course of her introduction, subscribed to the insurance of Samsung Life and maintained the customer relationship. While maintaining the customer relationship, the Defendant had the victim C subscribe to the insurance of Samsung Life as if he/she subscribed to the insurance of Samsung Life and issued a false subscription document and a false receipt in the name of Samsung Life and had the victim belonged to C, by issuing the victim’s false subscription form in the name of Samsung Life and issued a false receipt, and had C borrow personal benefits, such as receiving insurance premiums from the victim C and the victim’s father D, and the victim’s mother E, and receiving interest from the Defendant.

1. Fraud;

Around April 10, 208, the Defendant received insurance premiums from the victim C, and the Defendant made a false statement as if he/she had no intent or ability to normally pay the Samsung Bio-resources insurance even though he/she did not have an intent or ability to buy the Samsung Bio-resources insurance. The Defendant received KRW 50 million from the victim as the insurance premium for Samsung Bio-resources, and received KRW 50 million from the victim from the victim until May 30, 2013, and received KRW 180 million as the insurance premium for Samsung Bio-resources of the victim, KRW 260 million as the insurance premium for the victim C, KRW 110 million as the insurance premium for Samsung Bio-resources of the victim D, and KRW 50 million as the insurance premium for Samsung Bio-resources of the victim E.

2. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

피고인은 2008. 4. 10.경 서울 종로구 공평동 51-1 공평빌딩 10층 삼성생명 종각지 점 사무실에서 허위의 삼성생명 '無재테크플랜 거치만기' 청약서를 작성하고 피해자 C으로부터 삼성생명 보험료 명목으로 5,000만원을 교부받은 다음 위 사무실의 컴퓨터 프로그램을 이용하여 '제1회 보험료 영수증, 보험종류: 무) 재테크플랜 거치만기, 계약자: C(G), 보험료: 일금 오천만원정(₩50,000,000), 보험료 받은 일시: 2008년 4월 10일 오후, 위 금액을 제1회 보험료로서 영수합니다. 삼성생명 보험회사 대표이사 H, 발행일자 2008년 4월 10일'이라는 허위 내용을 작성한 다음, 삼성생명 보험회사 대표이사 H의 이름 옆에 피고인이 기존에 보관하고 있던 정상적인 삼성생명 보험 영수증에 붙어 있던 대표이사 H의 직인을 오려 붙이는 방법으로 권리의무에 관한사문서인 삼성생명보험 주식회사 대표이사 H 명의의 보험료 영수증을 위조하고 마치 이를 삼성생명에서, 정상적으로 발행한 영수증인 것처럼 C에게 교부하여 행사한 것을 비롯하여, 그때부터 2013. 10. 5.경까지 별지 범죄일람표(2) 기재와 같이 사문서를 위조하고, 위조한 사문서를 행사하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A complaint (including attached documents);

Application of Statutes

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

Article 347(1) and (2) of the Criminal Act (the point of fraud), Article 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of aiding private documents), Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of uttering of the falsified Private Document), the choice of imprisonment, respectively.

1. It is inevitable to sentence a punishment in light of the following: (a) the total amount of damage for the reasons of sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes is not repaid in most of the names of KRW 550 million; and (b) the crime quality is inferior, such as the fabrication and use of private documents in the course of deception: Provided, That in determining the specific period of punishment, all circumstances should be taken into account, such as the fact that there is no criminal power against the defendant in determining the specific period of punishment; and (c) the defendant

Judges Lee Hy-soo