The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Defendant A (the age of 47) and the victim B (the age of 44) indicated in the facts charged as follows: (a) the Defendant demanded the victim to continue to meet with the customer and his employee; (b) the relationship was neglected.

On May 6, 2016, at around 00:45, the Defendant entered the “C main point” located in the D2 floor in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and met the victim B (n, 44 years old) who is an employee.

At this time, when the victim viewed the defendant and said, the victim prevented the entrance, and then threatened him/her. "I would always have to do so" and "I would have to do so."

B. On May 6, 2016, around 00:50 on May 6, 2016, the Defendant stopped the victim B (n, 44 years old) following the Gangseo-gu Seoul E-ro.

At this time, the victim frighted and frightened “the victim’s frighten frighten......... the body support ........” told the fright male relationship with the frighter, and then the frighter or again threatened the female.”

2. Reasons for dismissing the public prosecution: Article 283 (1) and (3) of the Criminal Act; Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act [Application for non-prosecution to punish the victim of September 26, 2016]