logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.12.11 2014고단3932
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등협박)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From September 2013 to the victim C (Y, 50 years of age) and from September 2013, the Defendant was often dissatisfied with the other victims suspected of sexual intercourses with the other victims, and thereby, the Defendant repeated the hedging with the south.

1. On June 29, 2014, the Defendant was in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective action, deadly weapons, etc.) in dialogue with the victim C at the restaurant room called "E" in the operation of the victim located in Gwangju North-gu, Gwangju-gu, on the ground that "the victim is dissurt with himself/herself on the ground that he/she met with him/herself." On the part of his/her hand, the Defendant was in violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violence, etc. (a collective action, deadly weapons, etc.), followed the victim's breath with his/her left hand and then pushed the victim's breath with his/her knife with his/her knife with his/her knife, and threatened the victim with his/her knife with his/her knife with his/her knife.

2. On September 5, 2014, at around 23:30 on September 5, 2014, the injured Defendant carried the victim’s arms in a G playground located in Jeonnam F, into into the victim’s male relation. On one hand, the injured Defendant saw the victim’s breath, booming the breath’s left part of the victim’s breath, and breath with other hand, carried the victim’s breath, cut off the victim’s arms, pushed the victim’s arms in his hand, pushed the victim’s breath, and pushed the victim into the victim’s breath, which requires treatment for about two weeks.

3. On October 14, 2014, at around 20:30 on October 20, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s legitimate restaurant operation by finding the victim as “E” restaurant for the operation of the Victim C, and then leaving the victim “the same story defect,” leaving the victim, leaving the victim intending to turn on booms inside the restaurant signboard and the restaurant, blocking the victim from driving on booms again, and preventing his/her female from turning on 30 minutes, thereby hindering the victim’s legitimate restaurant operation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement of the police officer.

arrow