A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, as to the victim Y, was aware of at the club of the club, was approaching the victim Y (titles before the opening of the club) as if the Defendant was a public official of class 5 of the Ministry of Administration and Home Affairs, with the Defendant’s access as if the Defendant was an “A” who is a public official of class 5 of the Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs, and had the victim

A. Accordingly, on July 28, 2016, the Defendant would provide the victim with a loan of funds to invest in the fishery products distribution business at the “AB” entertainment place located in the city of Jinju on July 28, 2016.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the Defendant was thought to use the money borrowed from the victimized party for entertainment or living expenses, and there was no plan to run the fishery products distribution business, and there was no particular income or occupation. Therefore, even if he borrowed money from the injured party, there was no intention or ability to repay the money.

As above, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; and (b) received total of KRW 6,489,00 from July 28, 2016 to August 1, 2016 from the damaged party.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

B. On August 1, 2016, the Defendant was aware of the fact that it was sent to a public official’s position to the Board of Audit and Inspection on the fact that it was discovered to a special protocol of the Board of Audit and Inspection, and is currently being investigated at the present time, at a mutually influence point in the place of view of the Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si.

The Disciplinary Committee made a false statement that it requires money to be settled well, and that if it is subject to a reduction of salary, the daily living expenses and business investment expenses are insufficient to lend money."

However, since the Defendant was not a public official, there was no reason for the victim to be investigated or subject to disciplinary action as a drinking day, and did not proceed with the business as described in the above paragraph (a), and there was no particular import or occupation, so there was no need for money in relation to disciplinary action, and money from the victim.