The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the above judgment is publicly notified.

1. The facts charged in the instant case, which the lower court found guilty and sentenced to the imprisonment for six months, are as follows: (i) the title of “the fraud of KRW 20 million,” “40 million,” “the fraud of KRW 45 million,” and “the fraud of KRW 45 million,” etc. is additionally stated by the first instance court for the convenience of understanding). (ii) The Defendant of fraud of KRW 20 million, around June 4, 2013, is necessary to make money to the victim E in front of the D convenience point in the area adjacent to the Heung-gu Seoul apartment site in Seo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul, to move to the superintendent of education in the year of 2014.

A false statement was made to the effect that the principal may borrow money as collateral and the principal shall pay interest on the loan, and shall pay 10 million won per month to 5 minutes per month.

However, the defendant did not have any special property at the time and did not have any occupation, so even if he borrowed money from the injured party, he did not have any intention or ability to repay the money and used the money from the injured party as a horse cost.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and acquired 10 million won on the same day as the loan money from the victim, and 10 million won on the 20th day of the same month and acquired it through a new bank account in the name of the defendant.

The Defendant, at the end of July 2013, was the victim of the D convenience store as described in paragraph (1) at the end of July 2013, “the cost of the election of the superintendent of education” is the victim.

The purpose was to make a false statement to the effect that “the lending of money was made.”

However, the defendant did not have any special property at the time and did not have any occupation, so even if he borrowed money from the injured party, he did not have any intention or ability to repay the money and used the money from the injured party as a horse cost.

As above, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and acquired 20 million won on the same day as the loan money from the victim, and 20 million won on August 4, 2013, respectively.

Fidelity 4.5 million won fraud Defendant is the victim’s “ urgently” in front of the D convenience points specified in paragraph 1 of December 10, 2013.