logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.06.11 2015가단101678
건물명도
Text

1. The Plaintiff, Defendant A, and Defendant B, each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1, and the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. On November 22, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with Defendant A to lease the instant real estate listed in attached Table 1 (hereinafter referred to as “instant real estate”) with each of the following terms: (a) around December 22, 2013; (b) around December 1, 2013, the lease agreement was concluded with Defendant B, setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 17,445,00; (c) KRW 225,30 per month; and (d) from December 1, 2013 to November 30, 2015; (c) around December 1, 2013, the Plaintiff delivered the instant real estate to Defendant B; and (d) concluded the lease agreement with Defendant B from July 28, 2014 to KRW 15,29,90,000; and (d) the lease agreement was concluded between Defendant B and the lease period of KRW 30,01,000 to KRW 30,50.10

B. According to each of the above lease agreements, in a case where the lessee has been in arrears for more than three consecutive months, the lessor may terminate the above contract.

C. However, from July 1, 2014, Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant B, from August 1, 2014, were in arrears for at least three consecutive months.

Therefore, the Plaintiff terminated each of the above lease agreements by serving a duplicate of the complaint against the Defendants. Therefore, Defendant A is obligated to deliver each of the instant real estate to the Plaintiff, Defendant A, and Defendant B, respectively.

2. Applicable provisions;

(a) Defendant A: Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

(b) Defendant B: Judgment based on the recommendation of confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act);

arrow