logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2019.12.12.선고 2019도12168 판결
모욕
Cases

2019Do12168 Defluence

Defendant

A person shall be appointed.

Appellant

Defendant

Defense Counsel

Law Firm Central Government

Attorney Jeong Jong-chul, and Husung (Seoul)

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul Central District Court Decision 2019Do258 Decided August 12, 2019

Imposition of Judgment

December 12, 2019

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment convicting all the charges of this case. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the relevant legal doctrine and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the establishment of a

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Park Jae-young

Justices Ansan-chul

Justices Park Sang-ok

Justices Noh Jeong-hee - - - –

Justices Kim Jae-hwan of the District Court

arrow