1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff A shall be modified as follows:

The defendant is against the plaintiff A 41,281.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant operates four-wheeled sub-loan points with the trade name of "F" from E on the racing market.

B. On August 18, 2010, Plaintiff A lent 4-wheeled Bab to the above lending store and caused the Defendant to a usual customer, thereby falling down on the lower side of the falling vehicle, while driving the letob on the river at the river at the dump of a road, which is a place where the Defendant had the customer operate the lebane (hereinafter “instant accident”). Accordingly, Plaintiff A suffered injury, such as lebart 1, 2, and 3-class gale (the right side), gabs, gabs, and rabulization of the lebs during the operation of the leb (hereinafter “instant injury”).

C. The river on the face of the above ice seems to continue to be flat, but in fact, it leads to flat 1.5 to 2 meters, and it appears from the lower part of the wall that led to plane.

Plaintiff

B is the father of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C is the mother of Plaintiff A.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Gap evidence 3-1, 2, Gap evidence 8, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Prior to the determination of the cause of the claim, evidence No. 10-1, No. 13-1, and evidence No. 13-1, the result of the on-site inspection conducted by the court of first instance, and the testimony by the witness G of the court of first instance added the purport of the entire pleadings. Plaintiff A requested to lend 4 o-bane free of charge to G after finding two daily owners on the date of the instant accident along with the above lending points operated by the Defendant, and thereafter he was an employee working as a part-time employee at the same time. G was also a free lending to the Defendant, but the Defendant did not make any answer, but the fact that the Defendant was going out without giving any answer, and G was considered to have been permitted by the Defendant, and was operated at the river where the instant accident occurred by lending 4 o-bane free of charge to Defendant A and its executives. However, it was announced that G was operated at the river where the instant accident occurred.