Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 2,50,00 for each of the KRW 66,618,450 for Plaintiff A, Plaintiff B, and C, and each of them from September 1, 2011 to September 2013.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Defendant is operating four-wheeled off-to-face rental points with the trade name of “F” from E on the racing-si.
B. On August 18, 2010, at the above lending point operated by the Defendant, Plaintiff A lent Orab, at its own lending point of Pyeongtaek, and the Defendant got off Orab to the river high-water site located in the front of the above lending point, which is a place where the Defendant had the Defendant go on the Orabab, and fell down into the back of Orabab, and thereby suffered from injury, such as Earpo-art 1, 2, 3rd Gaba, Gaba, lababa, and rabul rabul in the middle of the above lending point.
(hereinafter “instant accident”). C.
Plaintiff
B is the father of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C is the mother of Plaintiff A.
【Ground for recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap evidence 1, 3-1, 2, 8, 9-1, 2, and 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. A person operating Ortoba rental store on the cause of the claim has a duty of care to inform him of the precautions or matters to be observed in the operation of Ortoba in order to enable the users of Ortoba in a safe manner, to provide safety caps, etc., and to prepare for safety accidents by installing safety signs, safety fences, etc. at the place where Ortoba in other than Ortobabababab, and to prepare for any accident. If the purpose of the entire pleadings is added to witness G’s witness testimony, the Defendant did not install any safety signs or safety fences at the place where Ortobabababa rental store used by the Defendant, including the place where the instant accident occurred, and employees G who worked at the Ortoba rental store operated by the Defendant, would be at the place where the Plaintiff would be able to comply with the rules when driving Ortobabababab, or at the place where it would be at the place where it would be at the place where the Plaintiff.