logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.06.29 2016가합573972
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a corporation whose main business is the rest area of an expressway and the operation of a gas station.

The Plaintiff worked for the Defendant from January 1, 1996 to October 26, 2016.

B. On January 1, 1996, the Plaintiff joined the class accounting and promoted to Grade 5 on October 1, 1998. On July 1, 2014, the Plaintiff retired on October 26, 2016 while serving as a sales agent of a rest area.

After the plaintiff's entry, the workplace department, duties, and duties shall be as follows:

On January 1, 1996, the department of work in the position of the class of the issuance date, who is not in charge of the office of the class of the 6th class of the 5th class of the 5th class of the 5th class of the 5th class of the 5th class of the 5th class of the 5th class of the 5th class of the 5th class of the 5th class of the 5th class of the 5th class of the 5th class of the 5th class of the 5th class of the 5th class of the 5th class of the 5th class of the 5th class of the 5th class of the 5th class of the 5th class of the 5th class of the 5th class of the 5th class of the 5th class of the 5th class of the 5th class of the 5th class of the 5th class of the 2013 class of the 5th class of the 2013 class of the 14.

C. On April 10, 2014, the Defendant recruited a person retired from the company’s office against class 4 or higher employees as determined by the company among those who have served in continuous service for at least 10 years from April 10, 2014 to April 18, 2014, in order to provide employees with an opportunity to plan a new future, such as start-up and employment, by increasing the restructuring of the company and efficient management of human resources, and compensating for their meritorious services.

The plaintiff did not apply for the above desired retirement, which was recommended by the defendant on June 2014, and rejected it on June 15, 2014.

The contents of this case in relation to the defendant's organization rules, guidelines for promotion of employees, guidelines for Dong and circular assignment are as follows:

Article 4 of the Regulations on the Organization shall be responsible for corresponding duties according to the class and the duties of each class shall be as specified in attached Table 2.

arrow