logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.06.23 2019가단5169
물품대금 청구의 소
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 49,252,605 as well as 6% per annum from December 1, 2018 to June 23, 2020, respectively, to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff, who engages in the manufacture and sales of raw materials for clothing for basic facts, has continuously traded with the Defendant who supplied the raw materials from July 2017 to June 4, 2018, and supplied the raw materials to the Defendant on credit by June 4, 2018. After the last supply of raw materials, the Defendant deposited KRW 40,000,000 on July 31, 2018 and September 25, 2018 into the raw materials for which the unpaid raw materials remain as of September 10, 2018 are KRW 49,252,605 (including value-added tax).

[Ground for recognition] The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap's 1 through 4 (including a branch number, if any), and the purport of the whole pleading

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's claim

A. According to the above facts of recognition as to the cause of the claim, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff the amount of the original amount payable to the plaintiff 49,252,605 won and damages for delay, barring any special circumstances.

B. As to the Defendant’s assertion, (i) the original part of the Defendant’s assertion supplied by the Plaintiff from October 2017 to the original part of the original part of the Defendant’s claim, the ice of the yellow fluor that was not visible from the original part of the quality inspection was constantly discovered, and a yellow fluort was generated during the process of manufacturing clothing finished products (hereinafter “sulfur fluort”).

As a result, by November 2017, the Defendant suspended production without being taken as a finished product as a result of the occurrence of yellow half in the outer area of Chapter 289 in the process of manufacturing a finished product, and in 2018, at least 530 of the finished product manufactured was not sold or was returned and disposed of. approximately 3,449 must be placed in the original state without going further to the production process, and due to such defects, the Defendant could no longer sell home shopping, which was harmful to the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant is subject to destruction, ① production cost of Chapter 289,229,70 (=289 x production cost of 87,300 won per outer area) and ② finished product.

arrow