1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the money ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 6 as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff was requested from the defendant on May 31, 2013 to supply the clothing original unit on two occasions on July 18, 2013 and July 31, 2013, the plaintiff supplied the original unit of KRW 18,635,980 (the total amount of KRW 2,200 in color to the cover of the blus, burner, the foreropoch, the foreropoch, the total amount of KRW 2,200 in color to the foreropoch, and the foreropoch color to the " foreropoch original unit of this case") to the defendant. Thus, the defendant is not obligated to pay the remainder of KRW 4,317,90 from the defendant on October 10, 2013, and the remainder of the damages for delay to the plaintiff.

2. Judgment on the defendant's assertion

가. 피고의 주장 피고는 원고로부터 납품받은 이 사건 원단으로 완제품 의류를 제조하여 ㈜서양네트웍스라는 회사에 공급하였으나, 그 중 버건디 색상의 제품에서 이염이 발생하여 이를 모두 반품받아 워싱 및 고착 처리하여 재입고하였는바, 이로 인하여 반품 클레임 금액 4,217,786원, 일조워싱 비용 2,352,000원, 일조완성 비용 1,975,000원, 워싱후 10벌의 완제품 파손으로 인한 손해 515,000원, 상품반송 및 재입고 물류비 280,000원 합계 9,339,786원의 손해를 입었으므로, 원고가 주장하는 물품대금에서 피고가 입은 위 손해액을 공제한 나머지 금액에 대해서만 책임이 있다.

B. (1) In full view of the overall purport of the pleadings in the statement Nos. 3 and 5 of the evidence Nos. 3 and 5, the Defendant’s assertion on this part is with merit, on the ground that: (a) as the Plaintiff did not properly hold a crypt; and (b) the Plaintiff incurred a 2,352,000 won in the finished product color of a crypt; and (c) the Defendant’s assertion on this part

(2) However, comprehensively taking account of the contents of evidence Nos. 7 and 8 as a whole, 1.