1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this case is identical to that of the judgment of the court of the first instance except for addition or replacement as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The 5th page of the judgment of the court of first instance was added or mixd to the witness J and G with the witness J and the first instance trial witness G with the "J and the first instance trial witness G".

After the 6th end of the judgment of the court of first instance, the witness J, who was present at the time of the preparation of the above settlement statement, stated in this court that “at the time of the preparation of this case’s settlement statement, the Plaintiff did not specifically conclude that the Plaintiff would transfer 40% of the D shares to Defendant C without compensation, and the Defendant C also did not conclude that the Plaintiff would return or renounce D shares.” (The witness J stated in this court that “40% of the D shares would be 40% of the D shares would be returned,” but it seems that it was merely the witness J’s idea.

(i) add '';

3. Therefore, the plaintiff's lawsuit against the defendant B is dismissed as it is unlawful, and the plaintiff's claim against the defendant C shall be dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is justified with this conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.