The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

The plaintiff's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, while examining the evidence submitted in the court of first instance (Evidence Nos. 8 through 11, No. 35 through 37, and witness Y's testimony in the court of first instance) submitted in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and decision of the court of first instance are justifiable.

Therefore, the court's reasoning on this case is as follows. The third-party 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance.

(ii)Paragraph (e)(2)(2)(2-19(2)(2)(2)(2)(2)(2)(2)(2)(19(2)(2)(2)(2)(2)(2)(2)(2)(2)(2)(2)(2

The plaintiff's assertion e) (e) of the part added or used (No. 3-2) (e) (e) of the plaintiff's assertion is that the plaintiff, as of March 16, 2016, the agreement of this case (No. 1) and the statement of payment (No. 2) as of August 19, 2016, F, the representative of the defendant, have lawfully obtained the right of representation from the defendant. Even if Y prepares the part under the defendant's name at will without the defendant's delegation, the defendant granted the basic right of representation to Y, and the plaintiff was bound to believe that Y has the right of representation to prepare the agreement of this case and the statement of payment. (2) If the seal of the holder's signature affixed on a private legal document is present by his/her will, it is presumed that the authenticity of the signature is established, and if it is presumed that the act of the holder of the title will be presumed to have been in accordance with Article 358 of the Civil Procedure Act, the presumption of the authenticity is made.