logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.11.30 2014누3619
시정명령및과징금납부명령취소
Text

1. The Defendant’s corrective order and the payment order indicated in Annex A Section 2, which was issued against the Plaintiff on November 27, 2013, against the Plaintiff as a resolution A, and the payment order.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

Plaintiff

The Plaintiff, a business operator operating vessel building business, who is not a small and medium business operator under Article 2 (1) of the Framework Act on Small and Medium Enterprises, is a business operator who is not a small and medium business operator under Article 2 (1) of the Framework Act on Small and Medium Enterprises and entrusts the manufacturing of vessel block assembly, etc. to a small and medium business operator who is a small and medium business operator and entrusts the manufacturing of vessel processing business, such as vessel block assembly, to a small and medium business operator who is a small and medium business operator and is defined as a principal contractor under Article 2 (2) 1 of the Fair Transactions in Subcontracting Act (amended by Act No. 11842, May 28, 2013; hereinafter referred to as the "subcontract Act").

Meanwhile, eight business operators, including B, etc. (hereinafter “the subcontractor in this case”) are small and medium business operators engaged in the processing business of vessel block assembly, towering, etc., who are entrusted with the manufacture of vessel block assembly, towering, etc. from the Plaintiff, and subcontractors under Article 2(3) of the Subcontract Act. Subcontract consideration that the Plaintiff traded with the subcontractor in this case for the last three years is indicated below in total as KRW 32,660,000.

(E) Table 1:

arrow