logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2013.04.10 2013고정187
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A violation of the Road Traffic Act (not after-accident) is a driver of fwing, freezing, or freezing the vehicle.

The driver of a vehicle shall accurately operate the steering system, brakes and other devices of the vehicle and shall not drive the vehicle at a speed or in such a manner as to inflict any danger and obstacle on others according to the road traffic conditions and the structure and performance of the vehicle.

In addition, when any person is killed or injured or any goods are damaged due to the traffic of any motor vehicle, the driver and other crew members of the motor vehicle shall immediately stop the motor vehicle and take necessary measures, such as providing assistance to casualties.

Nevertheless, at around 04:10 on December 23, 2012, the Defendant runs two-lanes between the two-lanes in the direction of next to the GSgas charging station located in the GSgas charging station located in the next City movable property located in the following City:23:10.

At the same place of accident, the part which is behind the right side of the C vehicle in the same direction, conflicts with the above vehicle of the defendant, followed by about 20 meters, and the front part of the D vehicle parked in the right-hand OK car parking lot has collisioned with the front part of the above vehicle of the defendant.

As a result, the Defendant destroyed the C Vehicle to receive the unpaid amount of repair cost, and escaped without any measure even if it damages the D Vehicle amounting to KRW 2,481,970 for repair cost.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the same time and at the same time, while under the influence of alcohol, drives approximately 1 km from an industrial company near the shooting distance in the north of the ledger to the roads adjacent to the sloping-dong in the sloping-dong, the Defendant refused a drinking test even though there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol on three occasions on December 23, 2012, around 06:11, around 06:20 of the same day, around 06:20 of the same day, and around 06:29 of the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Traffic accident report, accident detection report, and accident-taking driver;

arrow