logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.11.24 2016고단1715
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (U.S.) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) are those who are engaged in driving a rocketing car;

On April 29, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car on April 05, 2016, and continued to drive it on the top of the two-lane of the Dmomour located in Yongsan-gu, U.S., U.S. C, one-lane of the two-lane of the Dmourel located in U.S., U.S., in the middle of U.S., the Defendant was directly driving from the e

However, at the same time, the F rocketing taxi driven by the victim E (the age of 47) was in the air signal stop at the front of the moving direction. In such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle, such as securing the safety distance with the preceding vehicle, properly operating the steering and steering devices.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and proceeded as is, and received the back part of the said rocketing taxi as the front part of the said rocketing car.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, caused the victim to suffer injury to salt ties and tensions that require approximately two weeks of medical treatment. At the same time, the Defendant, at the same time, did not take necessary measures, such as stopping immediately and saving the victim, so that the amount equivalent to KRW 3,312,714 of the repair cost, such as the exchange of the parts that spread back to the Defendant, would amount to KRW 3,312,714.

2. The defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall not operate any motor vehicle on the road which is not covered by mandatory insurance as a holder of the said rocketing motor vehicle;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated the said rocketing car without mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in the preceding paragraph.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A traffic accident-related statement prepared by E;

1. The application of the Act and subordinate statutes to actual condition survey reports, photographs, mandatory insurance policies, medical certificates, and estimates;

arrow