1. Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

2. The Defendants did not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is an employee of the E Dong business, and Defendant B is an employee of the Fdong business.

1. Defendant A: (a) around 14:00 on November 13, 2014, the Defendant: (b) called “a victim B(36 years of age) and a display stand-off in the Hart located in Chungcheongnam-gun G, Jeoncheon-gun; (c) the victim would take away the victim’s face and body at one time; (d) the victim’s face and body was moved to a marina parking lot; and (e) the victim suffered injury, such as a franchis and franchis, for about four weeks of treatment, when the victim’s face and body was moved to a marina parking lot.

2. Defendant B, at the above temporary parking lot, set up against the victim A (the age of 47) and frighted to drink the victim’s face and body, and took the victim’s eye and body body back to twice to three times, and suffered injury, such as an internal wall fright, which requires treatment for about six weeks, by taking the victim’s eye and body part of the victim’s eye, into account two to three times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each investigation report (related to submission of a medical certificate);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report (the Hart No. Round Telephone Statement);

1. Relevant provisions concerning criminal facts and the Defendants who choose punishment: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The degree of injury inflicted by the Defendants on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not less exceptionally, but the Defendants appear to have committed the instant crime by contingency while carrying out their duties, agreed after the prosecution was instituted, and expressed a attitude against the mistake.

In addition, Defendant A has no record of the same crime except for a long time prior to a fine and a single time, and Defendant B has no record of the same crime.

In addition, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, relationship with the victim, motive, means and result of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc. as mentioned above are considered and the sentence like the order is imposed.