logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2019. 05. 16. 선고 2019두32924 판결
(심리불속행) 폐업전 양도에 해당하므로 재화의 공급에 해당함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Daejeon High Court (Cheongju)-2018-Nu1238 ( October 16, 2019)

Title

(ps) The supply of goods constitutes a transfer prior to closure of business.

Summary

(1) Where any legal cause, such as a contract to determine the value of the supplied goods, occurs prior to the closure of business, the supply time under the Value-Added Tax Act constitutes the supply prior to the closure of business even if the time of supply is determined after the cessation of business, and there is no ground to view that the business identity

Related statutes

Article 4 of the Value-Added Tax Act

Cases

2019Du32924 Disposition to revoke the imposition of value-added tax.

Plaintiff-Appellant

aa

Defendant-Appellee

Head of Chungcheong Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Daejeon High Court (Cheongju) 2018Nu1238 ( October 16, 2019)

Imposition of Judgment

May 16, 2019

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal on the grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided for in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition

arrow