beta
Text
Imprisonment with prison labor for each of the crimes listed in the judgment of the defendant 1 through 3, and for each of the crimes listed in the judgment of the defendant 4 through 7.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On April 18, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on April 26, 2016, in the support of the Sungnam branch of Suwon, for criminal fraud, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 26, 2016.
"2016 Highest 1694"
1. On November 16, 2015, the Defendant posted a notice stating that a store will be sold on the Internet Kakao Stop bulletin board, and the Defendant reported and contacted the above writing that “The victim C who sent KRW 420,000 to KRW 420,000,000 shall deliver three copies of the purchase price to no more than three days.”
However, even if the defendant receives the money from the injured party, he was the intent to use the money for gambling, etc., and he did not have the intention or ability to sell three copies of the money to the injured party.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 420,000 won from the victim to the bank account (E) in the name of the defendant's wife on the same day.
In addition, the Defendant, from November 16, 2015 to December 24, 2012 of the same year, by deceiving the victims by the same method six times in total, as shown in the list of crimes 1 attached hereto, and received a total of KRW 1,259,000 from the victims (Provided, That “F” recorded in the victim’s column No. 2 in the list of crimes No. 2 in the list of crimes was corrected to “G”). “F”
2. On March 7, 2016, the Defendant’s fraud against the Victim H sold the Internet NA 616GB frame at its home located in Sungnam-si A around 22:00 and on its website.
The phrase “in the event of deposit of money,” written to the victim H who reported and contacted, will send the money to the victim H at around 17:00 on March 8, 2016.
The phrase “ makes a false statement.”
However, even if the defendant receives the money from the injured party, he was the intention to use the money for gambling, etc., and did not normally have the intention or ability to sell the above mobile phone to the injured party.
Defendant 2.