logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.02.18 2015고합348
특수공무집행방해치상등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

" 2016 Gohap 27"

1. On October 18, 2015, the Defendant, in violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking) driven a D-burled car with alcohol concentration of about 1km from around 0.138% under the influence of alcohol level to the front road of the central oil station located in the north-dong at the same time on the road in front of the dwelling of the Defendant located in Yangyang-si, Yangyang-si, Chungcheongnam-si.

The Defendant 2015 Gohap 348 was found to have been aware of the influence of alcohol driving as above, and he tried to search for the E police box after drinking alcohol in the vicinity.

2. On October 18, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) driven a D-to-purd vehicle with alcohol level of about 0.183% in the section of approximately 1km from the uppermost of the central oil station in Yangsan City, which was located in 69, to the top of the police box of the Yangsan Police Station E (F), both of which were under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.183% in blood.

3. On October 18, 2015, the Defendant continued to drive a motor vehicle of soflured from the front of the police box of the relevant Yangsan Police Station Embari at around 23:55 on October 18, 2015, and parked at that place.

G Patrols damaged the repair cost of approximately KRW 1,080,946 by means of shocking twice the front part of the patrol vehicle.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.

4. The Defendant interfered with the performance of special official duties, at the same time and at the same place of the day, and at the same time, the police officer, H, I, and J, who belongs to the Yangsan Police Station E commander of the Yangsan Police Station, which observed the said patrol vehicle one-time shocked, h, I, and J set the boomed car, which is a dangerous object, and re-sprinked the patrol vehicle again.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted police officers who perform their duties by carrying dangerous objects, thereby hindering them from performing their duties.

Summary of Evidence

" 2016 Gohap 27"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver at home, and report of the detection of the driver at home; and

arrow