beta
Text
1. The defendant shall apply to the plaintiffs each ratio of shares in attached Table 2 to the land listed in attached Table 1.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. According to the land survey division drafted during the Japanese colonial period, such as the land situation and division, the land survey division written out on October 17, 1911 (hereinafter “instant situation land”) states that S, who had a domicile in the same Ri on the same day, was 1875 square meters prior to the Gyeonggi-gunO (hereinafter “instant assessment land”), 646 square meters (hereinafter “instant assessment land”), Qand 24 square meters (hereinafter “3 assessment land”), Qand 24 square meters (hereinafter “instant assessment land”), and 436 square meters prior to R. 436 square meters (hereinafter “instant assessment land”).
(2) From the land of this case through conversion into the area, change of land category, and reorganization of administrative district, the land of this case was divided ( March 20, 1953) Nos. 1, 3, 4, and 5 of Schedule Nos. 1, 1, 4, and 5 in the land of this case. The land of this case was divided ( March 30, 1942) from the land of this case No. 2, and the land of this case No. 3 was divided ( June 30, 1973) from the land of this case. The land of this case No. 4 was divided ( June 30, 1973) from the land of this case, the land of this case No. 7 of the same Schedule No. 7 was divided ( June 30, 1973). The land of this case and the land cadastral record were entirely destroyed by 625 pages, but the relevant lot No. 4 and 5 were not restored from the land cadastral record of this part.
B.
The inheritance relationship of the plaintiffs (1) At the time of the above circumstances, T (the plaintiffs' preference) resided in Gyeonggi-gun U.S., and upon the death of May 13, 1946, T (the grandchildren and Australia heir) succeeded to T (T) property according to the former customary law at the time, and V (V) died on September 12, 1998.
(2) While the Plaintiff A, B, C, D, E, F and X,Y, Z, AA, Z, AB, and AC were their spouse, they died in a state where there was no heir before V died. On December 6, 1979, AB died with Plaintiff K, L, M, and N as his child, and AC was deceased on January 16, 197 with Plaintiff H, I, and J, the spouse of Plaintiff G, Plaintiff H, I, and J.