logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2018.11.22 2018고단2427
특수협박
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at around 18:50 on October 10, 2018, demanded the cancellation of the contract of a mobile phone opened through the mobile phone agent of the victim C (YY 24 years old) operated in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, South-gu, Seoul, for the reasons that the contract was not revoked at the Defendant’s request, carried a knife (12cc in length on the knife) which is a dangerous thing in the knife in the knife and carried the knife (12cc in length on the knife) and laid off the knife, and the Defendant and the victim, who caused the above victim, did not appear to have knifed the knife of a chch fed flife, a person, and was sentenced to imprisonment.

While taking the bath, the victims were able to take four times the tables that the victims were seated and threatened with them. The victims threatened with them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written self-sufficiency in C and D;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning CCTV closure photographs;

1. Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act relating to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act / [Scope of Recommendation] No person who does not have the basic area (from April to June 1) (the person who is subject to special sentencing) (i.e., in light of the method of the instant crime, such as: (a) the fact that the nature of the relevant crime is extremely poor; (b) the fact that the Defendant recognizes the crime and threatens several victims; (c) there is no history of criminal punishment heavier than the fine; (d) there is no history of criminal history of the same crime; and (e) there is no history of criminal punishment heavier than the fine; (e) the Defendant’s age, sex, family relationship, motive and means of the crime; and (e) circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment is determined as ordered by the Disposition.

arrow