1. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On January 4, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with Defendant B to lease the five-story accommodation (148.50 square meters of land floor, 169.12 square meters of land floor, 168.28 square meters of 168.28 square meters of 168.28 square meters of 168.28 square meters of 145 square meters of 148.50 square meters of 148.50 square meters of 148.5 square meters of 15 square meters of 169.28 square meters of 200 million won of 200 million won of deposit, 5 million won of rent monthly, and 82 months from February 28, 2012 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) with Defendant B, and agreed as follows.

1. The deposit shall be increased by 50 million won per year for four years;

4. Where a tenant is not damaged by the number of floors, the building owner's responsibility;

B. By February 28, 2012, the Plaintiff paid KRW 200 million to Defendant B, and Defendant B prepared and delivered a written statement concerning the instant lease agreement to the Plaintiff on March 21, 2012, including the following:

1. The part considered to be the leakage and defect of the building up to 2012 is the responsibility of the building owner.

2. The electricity extension portion shall be liable to the building owner if necessary later.

C. On June 11, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) withdrawn a deposit increase provision of KRW 50 million as it is impossible for the Defendants to properly conduct business due to the defect in the building and the business environment; and (b) demanded the Defendants to accept the above matters as soon as possible and take measures to ensure that the use of and profit from the instant lease agreement is not impeded; and (c) sent a mail verifying the content that the instant lease agreement is terminated and the deposit is claimed for the payment of KRW 200 million if not corrected; and (d) the mail certifying the contents thereof reaches the Defendants at that time.

The Plaintiff maintained the franchise of this case as a lessor and maintained it as necessary for the use and profit-making of the franchise of this case against the Defendants in Youngcheon District Court Young-gu.