1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 50,000,000 for the Plaintiff and KRW 10% per annum from August 20, 2013 to August 20, 2014; and (b) the Plaintiff.

According to the party’s assertion and judgment evidence No. 1, the Defendant, on August 20, 2013, borrowed 50,000,000 won from the Plaintiff from the Plaintiff at “8.20” and “10% per annum (15% per annum per annum)” (hereinafter “the instant monetary loan agreement”). As such, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the interest rate of 50,000,000 won per annum from August 20, 2013 to August 20, 2014, calculated by the agreed interest rate of 15% per annum, the interest rate per annum from the next day to the date of full payment.

이에 대하여 피고는, C가 튠머니코리아(주)의 운영자금으로 사용할 것처럼 속여서 자신으로 하여금 원고로부터 위와 같이 50,000,000원을 차용하도록 한 후 이를 자신의 가수금채권을 회수하는데 모두 사용하였고, 원고도 이러한 사실을 잘 알고 있었으므로, 위와 같은 C의 사기행위를 이유로 이 사건 금전소비대차계약을 취소한다고 주장하나, 피고가 제출한 증거들만으로는 C가 피고가 주장하는 바와 같은 기망행위를 하였다

It is insufficient to find that the Plaintiff knew or could have known such fact, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, and the Defendant’s assertion that the instant monetary loan contract was revoked on the ground of C’s fraudulent act is rejected.

If so, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.