1. We affirm that the Defendant’s inorganic disposition against the Plaintiff on June 17, 2014 against the Plaintiff is null and void.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a school foundation that establishes and operates C University (hereinafter “instant university”), and the Plaintiff is a student attending the department of practical foreign language in the said university from March 1, 2011.

B. On January 20, 2014, the Defendant posted a letter on the free bulletin board of the university website of the instant case on the following grounds: “The Defendant: (a) caused the dispute among students by pointing out D/L that caused the dispute in the free bulletin board; (b) caused the dispute among students by criticisming D/L that caused the dispute in the free bulletin board; and (c) interfered with class and school administration by criticisming the plagiarism treatment and the method of public announcement by the E professor as an expression that underwent E professor, after giving an interim examination marking; and (d) interfered with class and school administration” (hereinafter “prior disciplinary action”); and (b) took a disciplinary action against the Plaintiff for three months of organic politics.

C. On January 27, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking confirmation of invalidity of disciplinary action against Seoul Central District Court 2014Gahap4830 on January 27, 2014, and filed an application for provisional disposition of suspension of the validity of regular school disposition with the same court on February 3, 2014, and posted a notice to the effect that prior disciplinary action and the Defendant’s school administration are unreasonable on the pertinent website’s free bulletin board from F after the period of disciplinary action expires.

On May 22, 2014, the Defendant proposed a disciplinary action against the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff distorted and distorted comments different from the facts even after the end of the period of the preceding disciplinary action, thereby hindering the academic affairs of the instant school and impairing its honor (hereinafter referred to as “instant disciplinary action”). On May 23, 2014, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the same on May 12, 2014, and held a meeting of each student guidance committee on June 12, 2014 and June 16, 2014. On June 17, 2014, the Defendant rendered an inorganic disposition against the Plaintiff on the grounds as follows.

(hereinafter “instant disciplinary action”) . [Grounds for the instant disciplinary action] Article 72 of the School Regulations, Article 7(1)2 and 10 of the Regulations on the Disciplinary Action against Students / [Grounds for Disciplinary Action]

(a)a school;