logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.01.13 2015고단1423
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등협박)등
Text

The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than six months and by imprisonment for not less than three months for each of the crimes set forth in the judgment No. 2 and No. 3.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Highest 1423]

1. The Defendant committing a special intimidation was not in good reputation with the victim B (34 tax) who was omitted from his wife, and on September 16, 2014, around 15:00 on September 16, 2014, on the ground that the victim was in the D cafeteria where the victim located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C had the Defendant’s wife, and rather, caused the victim’s crypology to demand the death, she is equal to fluor, fluor, bit of bitch.

The knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

[2015 Highest 4134] On July 24, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months and two years of suspended execution as a crime of fraud in the Incheon District Court’s Vice Branch branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 1, 2013.

2. On April 18, 2013, the Defendant, who committed fraud, is a person engaged in a motor vehicle maintenance business, and, on April 18, 2013, purchased a benz accident vehicle in KRW 10,300,000 including the vehicle price and repair cost, he/she would deliver it after completing the repair of the vehicle.

However, even if the defendant received money from the injured party, he/she did not have the ability or intent to deliver the money to the injured party by purchasing and repairing the benz vehicle.

The Defendant was transferred KRW 10,30,000 from the victim to the corporate bank account under the name of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim to take money by deceiving the victim.

3. On June 7, 2013, the Defendant committed fraud on June 7, 2013, the Defendant would complete repair and deliver the vehicle to the victim E by purchasing the vehicle involved in the accident with KRW 14,50,000,00 including vehicle price and repair cost.

However, even if the defendant receives the above money from the injured party, he purchased and repaired the spoke vehicle and did not have the ability or intent to deliver it to the injured party.

The Defendant was transferred from the victim to the account in the name of the Defendant to KRW 14.5 million.

In this respect.

arrow