A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

An applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

On September 18, 2016, at the office of the victim C located in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon on Sep. 18, 2016, the Defendant had a large number of accident vehicles that do not deal with insurance. In the industrial company that knows such accident vehicle, the Defendant first repaired it and then transferred it to the borrower.

In the event that the repair cost is invested, it is false that the vehicle involved in the accident will be repaired and the profits will be divided into half.

However, even if the defendant receives investment from the injured party, he thought that he will use it as a repayment of obligation to E, and as above, he did not have any intention or ability to get profits by repairing the accident vehicle.

The Defendant received KRW 2,50,000 from the injured party as a deposit account in the name of the National Bank in the name of the Defendant, and received KRW 591,110,000 in total over 165 times from the time to January 17, 2017, as shown in the list of crimes in attached Form.

After all, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. The details of transaction in the F Account of one Bank in the name of C, the details of transaction in the G Account of the National Bank in the name of A, and the details of account transaction (suspect-suspect);

1. 피의 자↔ 고소인 간 카카오 톡 대화 내역 법령의 적용

1. Article 3(1)2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes and Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 147 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes No. 147 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (the act of deception No. 147 of the crime) deceiving a small father to lend money to a small father who must promptly die, and the remaining act and deception are different, but the contents of the deception are different, and the victim who had been continually deceiving by using the same opportunity is recognized to be the singleness and continuity of the defendant's criminal intent against the whole crime of this case, and the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc