1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) adding the same content as that of Paragraph (2) between the 3rd and 11th of the first instance court's judgment; and (b) the 3rd of the 3rd of the 12th of the 12th of the 3rd of the 12th of the 12th of the 3rd of the 12th of the 12th of the 12th of the 15th of the 15th of the 15th of the 1

2. Additional parts of “The Plaintiff submitted the loan certificate No. 15 (Supplementary Deed) by asserting that the Plaintiff prepared several copies of the loan certificate in which the date of repayment and the date of preparation, etc. were recorded in the official space under the agreement with the Defendant at the trial, and that the Plaintiff was in custody of the Plaintiff. This is a loan certificate with the Defendant’s name stated in the first instance trial, the contents of which are somewhat different, and the date of maturity and date of preparation, and the Defendant’s seal affixed on the Defendant’s name stated in the statement. However, according to the result of the appraisal of the appraiser E at the court, it can be recognized that the Defendant’s name and the Defendant’s name were written in the column No. 15 (Supplementary Deed), and that the Defendant’s name is a document with a local seal, not an original document with which the seal and seal are written in the writing form, and thus, it cannot be admitted as evidence because the document No. 15 (Supplementary Deed) cannot be used as evidence.”

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.